<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Copernic Desktop Search</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kenyarmosh.com/copernic-desktop-search/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kenyarmosh.com/copernic-desktop-search/</link>
	<description>Ken Yarmosh is a product strategist who helps organizations, businesses, VCs, and technology developers maximize their Internet and mobile investments.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 14:44:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry Dysert</title>
		<link>http://kenyarmosh.com/copernic-desktop-search/#comment-8119</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Dysert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 21:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technosight.com/copernic-desktop-search/#comment-8119</guid>
		<description>I hope this blog is still active.  I&#039;ve (tentatively) replaced Google&#039;s desktop search with Copernic, but the latter doesn&#039;t seem to work.  For example, I told it I wanted to index all .EXE files (filenames only), and I selected C:\ and all subfolders.  After 3 days of running (so the index should certainly be current), it only finds a tiny fraction of .EXEs -- and all are just one level below C:\.  Is there a secret to getting CDS to index what I tell it to for the entire disk?  Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope this blog is still active.  I&#8217;ve (tentatively) replaced Google&#8217;s desktop search with Copernic, but the latter doesn&#8217;t seem to work.  For example, I told it I wanted to index all .EXE files (filenames only), and I selected C:\ and all subfolders.  After 3 days of running (so the index should certainly be current), it only finds a tiny fraction of .EXEs &#8212; and all are just one level below C:\.  Is there a secret to getting CDS to index what I tell it to for the entire disk?  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M4M</title>
		<link>http://kenyarmosh.com/copernic-desktop-search/#comment-8070</link>
		<dc:creator>M4M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 23:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technosight.com/copernic-desktop-search/#comment-8070</guid>
		<description>Have you installed the latest version (v. 2.01)?  Is it stable?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you installed the latest version (v. 2.01)?  Is it stable?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Yarmosh</title>
		<link>http://kenyarmosh.com/copernic-desktop-search/#comment-7346</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Yarmosh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 21:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technosight.com/copernic-desktop-search/#comment-7346</guid>
		<description>Haven&#039;t been watching it...but also haven&#039;t noticed any issues...which is obviously a good thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haven&#8217;t been watching it&#8230;but also haven&#8217;t noticed any issues&#8230;which is obviously a good thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tris Hussey</title>
		<link>http://kenyarmosh.com/copernic-desktop-search/#comment-7345</link>
		<dc:creator>Tris Hussey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 21:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technosight.com/copernic-desktop-search/#comment-7345</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s your experience been with memory and CPU load?  I&#039;ve used earlier versions of it and haven&#039;t been too impressed, but I&#039;m willing to give it another try.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s your experience been with memory and CPU load?  I&#8217;ve used earlier versions of it and haven&#8217;t been too impressed, but I&#8217;m willing to give it another try.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
