<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An Open Letter to TechCrunch&#8217;s Michael Arrington</title>
	<atom:link href="http://kenyarmosh.com/an-open-letter-to-techcrunchs-michael-arrington/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://kenyarmosh.com/an-open-letter-to-techcrunchs-michael-arrington/</link>
	<description>Ken Yarmosh is a product strategist who helps organizations, businesses, VCs, and technology developers maximize their Internet and mobile investments.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 14:44:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Geek Guy Rants &#187; Blog Archive &#187; IS this What Blog Network Really Need to Worry About</title>
		<link>http://kenyarmosh.com/an-open-letter-to-techcrunchs-michael-arrington/#comment-318</link>
		<dc:creator>The Geek Guy Rants &#187; Blog Archive &#187; IS this What Blog Network Really Need to Worry About</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2005 02:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technosight.com/?p=126#comment-318</guid>
		<description>[...] Exhibit C Exhibit D [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Exhibit C Exhibit D [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robyn Tippins</title>
		<link>http://kenyarmosh.com/an-open-letter-to-techcrunchs-michael-arrington/#comment-277</link>
		<dc:creator>Robyn Tippins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2005 17:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technosight.com/?p=126#comment-277</guid>
		<description>I think the main problem here is people aren&#039;t seeing that you JUST took the paid position.  All your earlier comments were completely unbiased.  Unfortunatly, some people think paid consultants are whores who will say anything for a buck...

If you were going to sell yourself, I doubt it would be for $100.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the main problem here is people aren&#8217;t seeing that you JUST took the paid position.  All your earlier comments were completely unbiased.  Unfortunatly, some people think paid consultants are whores who will say anything for a buck&#8230;</p>
<p>If you were going to sell yourself, I doubt it would be for $100.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Yarmosh</title>
		<link>http://kenyarmosh.com/an-open-letter-to-techcrunchs-michael-arrington/#comment-267</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Yarmosh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2005 14:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technosight.com/?p=126#comment-267</guid>
		<description>Carlos...are you referring to the lack of RSS auto-discovery? There is one RSS feed for each category on the &quot;Top Blog Articles&quot; page (located in the right-hand sidebar). Other views (&quot;Top Blogs&quot; and &quot;Freshest Stuff&quot;) were not as suitable for feeds. What other useability issues did you see? I&#039;d encourage you to contact Blogniscient and give them feedback

feedback [at] blogniscient [dot] com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carlos&#8230;are you referring to the lack of RSS auto-discovery? There is one RSS feed for each category on the &#8220;Top Blog Articles&#8221; page (located in the right-hand sidebar). Other views (&#8220;Top Blogs&#8221; and &#8220;Freshest Stuff&#8221;) were not as suitable for feeds. What other useability issues did you see? I&#8217;d encourage you to contact Blogniscient and give them feedback</p>
<p>feedback [at] blogniscient [dot] com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Podtech.net: InfoTalk Podcast Series</title>
		<link>http://kenyarmosh.com/an-open-letter-to-techcrunchs-michael-arrington/#comment-265</link>
		<dc:creator>Podtech.net: InfoTalk Podcast Series</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2005 08:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technosight.com/?p=126#comment-265</guid>
		<description>[...] Gabe kept his project top secret from most of the world up til last month and now it&#8217;s changing how people consume the web. Recently Dave Winer called his product an innovation that is changine the web. This week Mike Arrington at TechCrunch was publically called out over a post on memeorandum by a paid consultant to memeorandums competitor (btw: that no one has heard of until now - that consultant should pay Mike). Mike then responded. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Gabe kept his project top secret from most of the world up til last month and now it&#8217;s changing how people consume the web. Recently Dave Winer called his product an innovation that is changine the web. This week Mike Arrington at TechCrunch was publically called out over a post on memeorandum by a paid consultant to memeorandums competitor (btw: that no one has heard of until now &#8211; that consultant should pay Mike). Mike then responded. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlos</title>
		<link>http://kenyarmosh.com/an-open-letter-to-techcrunchs-michael-arrington/#comment-264</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2005 03:39:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technosight.com/?p=126#comment-264</guid>
		<description>Ken,

I&#039;ve been following this thread and I attempted to try Blogniscient myself.

Blogniscient has some *serious* usability issues making it less useful than Memeorandum. The most important of these is the inability to find RSS feeds easily (simply unacceptable for a service like Blogniscient).

You can find the rest of my comments on Blogniscient on my blog (http://eddorre.com/posts/351.aspx).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ken,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been following this thread and I attempted to try Blogniscient myself.</p>
<p>Blogniscient has some *serious* usability issues making it less useful than Memeorandum. The most important of these is the inability to find RSS feeds easily (simply unacceptable for a service like Blogniscient).</p>
<p>You can find the rest of my comments on Blogniscient on my blog (<a href="http://eddorre.com/posts/351.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://eddorre.com/posts/351.aspx</a>).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Supr.c.ilio.us: The Blog &#187; The best way to get on memeorandum &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://kenyarmosh.com/an-open-letter-to-techcrunchs-michael-arrington/#comment-263</link>
		<dc:creator>Supr.c.ilio.us: The Blog &#187; The best way to get on memeorandum &#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 21:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technosight.com/?p=126#comment-263</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8230; is to talk about memeorandum. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8230; is to talk about memeorandum. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susanna</title>
		<link>http://kenyarmosh.com/an-open-letter-to-techcrunchs-michael-arrington/#comment-262</link>
		<dc:creator>Susanna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 19:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technosight.com/?p=126#comment-262</guid>
		<description>I just heard about Blogniscient today, ironically via Memeorandum, which I just learned about last week. Since Daypop and Blogdex both stopped working about a week ago, I&#039;ve felt completely cut off from the blogosphere and I&#039;m looking for a new &quot;top linked stuff&quot; aggregator. 

Memeorandum has been OK, but it only covers tech and politics and it separates them into two pages. I like what I see of Blogniscient so far: it covers a variety of topics on one page. Though I don&#039;t like the way they&#039;re separated by topic; it would be nice if there were an option to just see all the links mixed together regardless of subject so I know what&#039;s really hot.

If my two favorite aggregators are indeed gone forever, Blogniscient might be an OK substitute.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just heard about Blogniscient today, ironically via Memeorandum, which I just learned about last week. Since Daypop and Blogdex both stopped working about a week ago, I&#8217;ve felt completely cut off from the blogosphere and I&#8217;m looking for a new &#8220;top linked stuff&#8221; aggregator. </p>
<p>Memeorandum has been OK, but it only covers tech and politics and it separates them into two pages. I like what I see of Blogniscient so far: it covers a variety of topics on one page. Though I don&#8217;t like the way they&#8217;re separated by topic; it would be nice if there were an option to just see all the links mixed together regardless of subject so I know what&#8217;s really hot.</p>
<p>If my two favorite aggregators are indeed gone forever, Blogniscient might be an OK substitute.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mashable* &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Humans vs Algorithms: Who Should Edit Web 2.0? - Internet Entrepreneur Pete Cashmore on Web 2.0 and the Future of the Internet</title>
		<link>http://kenyarmosh.com/an-open-letter-to-techcrunchs-michael-arrington/#comment-261</link>
		<dc:creator>Mashable* &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Humans vs Algorithms: Who Should Edit Web 2.0? - Internet Entrepreneur Pete Cashmore on Web 2.0 and the Future of the Internet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 17:08:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technosight.com/?p=126#comment-261</guid>
		<description>[...] Paul Montgomery has been dropping a lot of hints recently about his yet-to-launch site TinFinger. It seems to be a blog news service along the lines of Memeorandum and Blogniscient. And with all the controversy about both Memeorandum and Blogniscient in recent days, Paul has had a lot to say. His latest post on automated editors versus human editors, which he phrases as &#8220;humans vs robots&#8220;, is so darned intriguing I thought I&#8217;d haul a big chunk of it over here and see if we can figure it out:  If you want the whole Web, or whatever type of Web document you choose to focus on (like news stories), then robots are going to win over armies of humans. Yahoo&#8217;s human-edited directory could not keep up with the explosion of Web sites, but Google&#8217;s robots could. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Paul Montgomery has been dropping a lot of hints recently about his yet-to-launch site TinFinger. It seems to be a blog news service along the lines of Memeorandum and Blogniscient. And with all the controversy about both Memeorandum and Blogniscient in recent days, Paul has had a lot to say. His latest post on automated editors versus human editors, which he phrases as &#8220;humans vs robots&#8220;, is so darned intriguing I thought I&#8217;d haul a big chunk of it over here and see if we can figure it out:  If you want the whole Web, or whatever type of Web document you choose to focus on (like news stories), then robots are going to win over armies of humans. Yahoo&#8217;s human-edited directory could not keep up with the explosion of Web sites, but Google&#8217;s robots could. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om Malik&#8217;s Broadband Blog &#8212; &#187; Blogging catfight</title>
		<link>http://kenyarmosh.com/an-open-letter-to-techcrunchs-michael-arrington/#comment-260</link>
		<dc:creator>Om Malik&#8217;s Broadband Blog &#8212; &#187; Blogging catfight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 16:53:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technosight.com/?p=126#comment-260</guid>
		<description>[...] Ken Yarmosh, a paid consultant to Blogscient is upset that his client didn&#8217;t get a fair shake from Techcrunch because Mike is Gabe.memeorandum&#8217;s friend. Mike fires back. Will Scoble play daddy? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ken Yarmosh, a paid consultant to Blogscient is upset that his client didn&#8217;t get a fair shake from Techcrunch because Mike is Gabe.memeorandum&#8217;s friend. Mike fires back. Will Scoble play daddy? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scobleizer - Microsoft Geek Blogger &#187; Ken feels Blogniscient isn&#8217;t getting a fair shake</title>
		<link>http://kenyarmosh.com/an-open-letter-to-techcrunchs-michael-arrington/#comment-258</link>
		<dc:creator>Scobleizer - Microsoft Geek Blogger &#187; Ken feels Blogniscient isn&#8217;t getting a fair shake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 02:44:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technosight.com/?p=126#comment-258</guid>
		<description>[...] Ken Yarmosh feels that Blogniscient isn&#8217;t getting a fair shake. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ken Yarmosh feels that Blogniscient isn&#8217;t getting a fair shake. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch</title>
		<link>http://kenyarmosh.com/an-open-letter-to-techcrunchs-michael-arrington/#comment-256</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 02:35:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.technosight.com/?p=126#comment-256</guid>
		<description>Ken,

A few thoughts.

1. I apologize if I haven&#039;t answered your emails. I&#039;m a one man shop and I get hundreds of emails a day. I cannot read all of them. It&#039;s something that I beat myself up over constantly because I feel that if someone takes the time to email me, I should take the time to read it and write back. I may hire someone to help out at TechCrunch, but given that it is a zero revenue site I don&#039;t know when that will happen.

2. TechCrunch is not an objective site. It&#039;s all about my opinions. I&#039;ve never claimed otherwise.

3. I apologize if I did not give your client a stand alone review. To be fair, I don&#039;t think it deserves a stand alone review and is interesting, at this time, only as part of the broader discussion of how memeorandum is changing the web. I wrote my opinion of the service, and gave what I believe is a quite favorable review. In my opinion, and I repeat, in my opinion, memeorandum is a far superior service.

4. I have an open house here in Atherton and I invite many people to stay. During the web 2.0 conference people were on the floors, on the couches, in the bedrooms. One of those people is a VC with a $30m net worth. I didn&#039;t include him in my top VCs post. He&#039;s pissed. He&#039;ll get over it.

Gabe has stayed here, and he has grown to be a friend. This has developed after I&#039;ve gotten to know memeorandum, and quite frankly one of the reasons I like hanging out with him is that he&#039;s so damn smart. There is no nepotism in my posts on memeorandum.

I have no financial or other interest in memeorandum, nor have I been paid to write anything about memeorandum or any other company.

5. I think you should look in the mirror. You are a paid consultant to blogniscient and this wasn&#039;t disclosed in your early posts, or in the comments you blanketed the blogospere with.

I am launching a company called edgeio in the near future. I&#039;ve posted, once, on edgeio, and I fully disclosed that I am a founder. I also said I won&#039;t be posting on it much, if at all, in the future. 

6. If people like Robert Scoble and Dave Winer think Memeorandum is great, perhaps it is simply because it is.

7. I think you owe me an apology for this open letter, regarding your claims of a conflict of interest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ken,</p>
<p>A few thoughts.</p>
<p>1. I apologize if I haven&#8217;t answered your emails. I&#8217;m a one man shop and I get hundreds of emails a day. I cannot read all of them. It&#8217;s something that I beat myself up over constantly because I feel that if someone takes the time to email me, I should take the time to read it and write back. I may hire someone to help out at TechCrunch, but given that it is a zero revenue site I don&#8217;t know when that will happen.</p>
<p>2. TechCrunch is not an objective site. It&#8217;s all about my opinions. I&#8217;ve never claimed otherwise.</p>
<p>3. I apologize if I did not give your client a stand alone review. To be fair, I don&#8217;t think it deserves a stand alone review and is interesting, at this time, only as part of the broader discussion of how memeorandum is changing the web. I wrote my opinion of the service, and gave what I believe is a quite favorable review. In my opinion, and I repeat, in my opinion, memeorandum is a far superior service.</p>
<p>4. I have an open house here in Atherton and I invite many people to stay. During the web 2.0 conference people were on the floors, on the couches, in the bedrooms. One of those people is a VC with a $30m net worth. I didn&#8217;t include him in my top VCs post. He&#8217;s pissed. He&#8217;ll get over it.</p>
<p>Gabe has stayed here, and he has grown to be a friend. This has developed after I&#8217;ve gotten to know memeorandum, and quite frankly one of the reasons I like hanging out with him is that he&#8217;s so damn smart. There is no nepotism in my posts on memeorandum.</p>
<p>I have no financial or other interest in memeorandum, nor have I been paid to write anything about memeorandum or any other company.</p>
<p>5. I think you should look in the mirror. You are a paid consultant to blogniscient and this wasn&#8217;t disclosed in your early posts, or in the comments you blanketed the blogospere with.</p>
<p>I am launching a company called edgeio in the near future. I&#8217;ve posted, once, on edgeio, and I fully disclosed that I am a founder. I also said I won&#8217;t be posting on it much, if at all, in the future. </p>
<p>6. If people like Robert Scoble and Dave Winer think Memeorandum is great, perhaps it is simply because it is.</p>
<p>7. I think you owe me an apology for this open letter, regarding your claims of a conflict of interest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
